The Facebook article is greatly disturbing. I’ve never understood the appeal of, BigBrotheresque, social networking sites to begin with. Particularly those of my friends that expressed their concerns about privacy when I got a rebate card from the drugstore chain I usually buy my stuff at have signed up to any national and international social networking site one can think of. Apparently it’s ok for them to have others know who they remotely know or share the same views on sushi with but not ok for them to have my drugstore know my cats like the cheese-filled crunchy cat treats and I use Nivea and Dove shampoo and conditioner; stuff anybody roaming through my rubbish could find out if it really was so important. To me, the flipside of the sites is that they disconnect people from others that choose old-fashioned virtual communication; those that refuse to sign up are not “in the know” and are left out of ongoing events – out of convenience. Afterall, why bother emailing some info, text-messaging or giving a call when everybody can check on your personal schedule online? Didn’t your mother sort of do that, too, when she checked your timetable and packed your schoolbag for the following day during first grade? And how come I’m the only one among the people that used to hang out during university that gets to see the world through actual travelling? But I suppose you better not put first graders on a long-distance flight to foreign shores to entertain themselves there for a while…
Daniel–You know MySpace is owned by Newscorp, the company that owns Fox News and The Weekly Standard, among other insanely conservative news outlets, right?
The Facebook article is greatly disturbing. I’ve never understood the appeal of, BigBrotheresque, social networking sites to begin with. Particularly those of my friends that expressed their concerns about privacy when I got a rebate card from the drugstore chain I usually buy my stuff at have signed up to any national and international social networking site one can think of. Apparently it’s ok for them to have others know who they remotely know or share the same views on sushi with but not ok for them to have my drugstore know my cats like the cheese-filled crunchy cat treats and I use Nivea and Dove shampoo and conditioner; stuff anybody roaming through my rubbish could find out if it really was so important. To me, the flipside of the sites is that they disconnect people from others that choose old-fashioned virtual communication; those that refuse to sign up are not “in the know” and are left out of ongoing events – out of convenience. Afterall, why bother emailing some info, text-messaging or giving a call when everybody can check on your personal schedule online? Didn’t your mother sort of do that, too, when she checked your timetable and packed your schoolbag for the following day during first grade? And how come I’m the only one among the people that used to hang out during university that gets to see the world through actual travelling? But I suppose you better not put first graders on a long-distance flight to foreign shores to entertain themselves there for a while…
Does this mean we can’t be friendsters or myspacers?
I never liked Facebook! Myspace is truly proletarian yo.
Ray, I’m sorry..
Daniel–You know MySpace is owned by Newscorp, the company that owns Fox News and The Weekly Standard, among other insanely conservative news outlets, right?
Proletarian my ass.
[This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of Scientology International]
“Hand us the cash.”?
Ma’ariv: Leviev Boasts A Contribution That Never Existed
http://www.business-humanright....._page_view
… was Ray’s comment a meta-joke, or is Dan really bending over backwards to HubbCo?
joke