|
Here’s a theory of social change I’d like to float: Initial attempts
by the established order to respond to sweeping changes are either
murderous or ridiculous.
The first part is obvious: the French Revolution, Kent State, Arab dictatorships.
As for the second, Exhibit No. 1 would be Dick Cavett’s sideburns.
Around the early ‘70s, when the ‘60s revolution was actually happening,
I kept noticing how members of the media establishment — Dick Cavett,
John Chancellor — all tried to fit in by letting their sideburns grow.
Anchormen with sideburns, aging actors with sideburns, middle-aged
rabbis with sideburns — everyone I once respected was starting to look
like Chester A. Arthur. All because they thought that’s where society
was going and they didn’t want to be left out.
Exhibit No. 2 is Arianna Huffington. This week she unveiled her
newest venture, The Huffington Post, an online compendium of articles
and musings. Following incarnations as biographer, Republican hostess,
gubernatorial candidate and right-wing, then left-leaning iconoclastic
pundit (not quite in that order), Arianna 6.0 is now the master of her
very own digital domain. She has seen the future and is trying to leap
from the choo-choo of a weekly print column to the Maglev of daily
Internet interactivity.
Being the shape-shifting multilinguist that she is, Huffington’s own
posts are close doppelgangers of what the technically hip these days
call blogging, that is Web logs or diaries that record the author’s
thoughts, feelings and experiences in something like real time while
also posting links to online articles or musing by other bloggers.
But many of those Huffington has invited on are more like Exhibit
No. 3: actors who respond to the written word like us non-actors would
to a close-up; real writers like Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. who are
clearly uncomfortable publishing something short of a 10th draft, and
even Walter Cronkite, who wrote something brief and forgettable, maybe
about sideburns.
The only memorable entries out of several dozens were by Larry David
and Bill Maher — because no matter what the venue, funny is funny.
One hallmark of the blogosphere is that, like talk radio, it tends
to cater to the converted. Instead of people of different political
persuasions sharing a common forum, every group gets to fine-tune news
and essays to its liking. So Huffington’s Post is the circled wagons of
successful, well-off liberals — let the word go forth from Brentwood.
Nothing wrong with that, I just wonder where and how all these online opposing camps will intersect.
Once in a while, a right-wing freerepublic.com blogger might get
into a long, predictable e-mail shouting match with a Huffington
poster, but that’s not the same as sharing a common medium or forging
social progress through dialogue.
As goes the big, wide world, so goes the Jewish one.
Earlier this month, Sh’ma magazine organized an e-mail exchange
between a blogger and me on the future of Jewish journalism in the
internet age. The magazine will publish an edited version of our
on-line conversation in its upcoming issue.
The blogger, Dan Sieradski of www.jewschool.com, informed me that my days in the old media were numbered.
“You guys are finished,” he wrote. I think I took the heat out of his flaming when I wrote back that I agreed.
There are at least 1 million blogs on the internet now. Anybody with
a computer, a modem and a thought in his head can start one. In many
instances, it seems, that thought is: I think I’ll start a blog.
There are hundreds of Jewish-oriented blogs. One tracks the daily
life of an Orthodox woman. New ones detail the struggles of settlers in
Gaza, facing the Israeli withdrawal. There are blogs from gay Jews,
frum Jews, gay frum Jews, pro-Israel Jews and anti-Zionist Jews.
There’s an interesting blog called Jewish Whistle Blower, which
purports to detail the shady goings on of the Jewish establishment. But
someone out there felt that particular blog wasn’t forthcoming enough,
so this week up popped Jewish Whistle Blower2, because, that site says,
“Open debate is simply too difficult for JWB.”
Amid all this new media, I’m supposed to be the Jewish Bruce Willis,
still reporting for work without realizing I’ve already died.
Of course, no one, not even JWBs 1 or 2, know what the Internet
future holds. As high-capacity streaming becomes more common, and live
video replaces the ancient act of typing, blogging itself will likely
be replaced by even more immediate forms of communication. Today’s
bloggers might just be the IBM Selectrics of their time.
Along the way to this future, there’s no question digital
information is replacing print. Newspaper readership is plummeting,
especially among younger adults. And although you would think the
change would take place more slowly in traditional communities, that
doesn’t seem to be the case. As one Orthodox rabbi told me this week,
he hardly looks at anything in print anymore. I assume the exception is
a certain parchment scroll.
This is as it should be. If Moses had access to OS X and an Apple
AirPort, he wouldn’t have risked a hernia schlepping stone tablets down
a mountain. Here we are, the People of the Blog.
Although new technology replaces old, there’s no cause for hysteria.
Journalists, after all, aren’t in the printing business, we’re in the
information-distribution business. The Internet doesn’t change the
essential news-gathering and news-disseminating function of journalism.
But it does change plenty else.
It is simplistic to speak of blogs in general, as some are
brilliant, some, like Huffington’s, predictable, and some awful. But
the good Jewish ones inject Jewish life with more immediacy, more
information. They allow any and all Jews to contribute to the larger
community, to voice opinions and claim a stake in the Jewish debates.
Many of them are more entertaining than most of the old Jewish media.
But the ease and anonymity of an Internet post, the heat of the
online battle, can induce bloggers to slip their ethical moorings. The
temptation to peddle gossip, to spread reputation-destroying questions
before they can be fully investigated, to run with half-baked
information or coarse material just for the shock value, is as great or
greater in the blogosphere as it is in, well, the atmosphere. But
blogging makes it easier and cheaper.
The world has changed, yes. But our traditions — as journalists and Jews — are here to remind us that the rules haven’t.
|